Knowledge Network Analysis in Universities: Open Innovation and Academic Governance
Abstract
This article examines how knowledge networks within Latin American universities can enhance open innovation and strengthen academic governance. Using a quantitative approach and social network analysis (SNA), the study explores the structure and dynamics of internal networks in three public universities located in Colombia, Peru, and Mexico. The findings reveal common patterns such as high centrality of certain nodes, overall low network density, and the presence of communities that do not align with formal institutional structures. A positive correlation was found between institutional openness and network cohesion, and it was observed that highly connected actors also tend to hold decision-making positions. Based on these results, the article proposes strategic implications for redesigning organizational structures, participatory governance models, and open innovation policies. The study concludes that actively managing internal knowledge networks enables universities to become more collaborative, adaptive, and strategically oriented ecosystems.Downloads
References
Bernasconi, A. (2006). Does the affiliation of universities to external organizations foster their academic performance? Higher Education Policy, 19(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300104
Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.
Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2014). Managing open innovation in large firms: Survey report. Fraunhofer Verlag.
De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards New Public Management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations (pp. 137–152). Springer.
De Fuentes, C., & Dutrénit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026
De Silva, M., Howells, J., & Meyer, M. (2021). Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Influence mechanisms in university-industry interactions. Research Policy, 50(1), 104109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104109
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2
Kehm, B. M., & Lanzendorf, U. (2006). Reforming university governance. Springer.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
Marginson, S. (2022). Higher education and the common good: A global perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1843156
Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., ... & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988
Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., & West, J. (2014). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press.
Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: The business value of AI-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893–1924. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0411
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
West, J., & Bogers, M. (2021). Open innovation: Current status and research opportunities. Innovation: Organization & Management, 23(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1977570
Cómo citar: Autor, 1., Auto, 2. y Autor, 3. (202_). Titulo. International Journal of Management Science & Operation Research (IJMSOR), V(No), ppini-ppfin
Published papers are the exclusive responsibility of their authors and do not necessary reflect the opinions of the editorial committee.
IJMSOR respects the moral rights of its authors, whom must cede the editorial committee the patrimonial rights of the published material. In turn, the authors inform that the current work is unpublished and has not been previously published.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

